|
TOPIC-CATEGORIES in this page:
Overviews miscellaneous short-lived isotopes RATE — Woodmorappe critiques Inaccurate Dates Faster Decay Rates Radiometric & Geology — Carbon 14 K–Ar Ar–Ar Lu–Hf U–Th–Pb Isochron Method Helium Diffusion Fission Tracks Polonium Halos The current links-page for radiometric dating — underdeveloped and needing expansion— is RADIOMETRIC DATING: AGE OF THE EARTH & UNIVERSE.
|
| | |
|
This page is in a more "rough and incomplete" form than the other three potential-resource pages — for Noah's Flood, Geology, and Astronomy — so (as a reminder) it has a GRAY BACKGROUND.
|
| | |
|
Support for a YOUNG EARTH & UNIVERSE
|
Support for an OLD EARTH & UNIVERSE
|
RADIOMETRIC DATING — general overviews • AIG-ABook - How accurate is Carbon-14 dating? [and other types] * http://answersingenesis.org/docs2002/carbon_dating.asp and same text but w added pics & links in http://christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c007.html • Chadwick, Various Questions Re: Radiometric Dating * http://origins.swau.edu/q&a/radio/default.html is now http://origins.swau.edu/q_and_a/radio/default.html • Clyde Webster, Genesis and Time: What Radiometric Dating Tells Us * http://grisda.org/georpts/gr21_01.htm Taylor - Various Questions Re: Radiometric Dating * http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-radioactive.html Pitman - [big] Radiometric Dating Methods * http://naturalselection.0catch.com/Files/radiometricdating.html Woodmorappe, National Geographic magazine joins the dating game * http://trueorigin.org/natgeo_jw01.asp and is also in AIG, http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v16/i1/dating_game.asp Walker - The Dating Game [C-14 + more, w pomo] http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v26/i1/game.asp PLAISTED-AND-HENKE SERIES (below) Plaisted, The Radiometric Dating Deception * http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/deception.html 1 - Plaisted, The Radiometric Dating Game (response to Henke-page, w radiometric & tree rings, coral reefs,É & geology) * http://trueorigin.org/dating.asp
2 - Henke, comments on #1 (PlaistedÕs ÒRadiometric Dating Game) http://www.tim-thompson.com/plaisted-review.html
3 – Plaisted email (with Henke replies) http://www.tim-thompson.com/plaisted-review3.html
4 Plaisted, Reply to [#2] Dr. Henke and Others (Re: Radiometric Dating) * http://trueorigin.org/henke1.asp
5 – Henke, comments on #3 (PlaistedÕs reply-to-Henke) http://www.tim-thompson.com/plaisted-review2.html
|
RADIOMETRIC DATING — general overviews • Wiens [shorter, 34 k, in first part of page] - http://reasons.org/resources/fff/2001issue07/index.shtml#dynamics_of_dating • Wiens - [111 k] Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective http://asa3.org/ASA/resources/Wiens.html • An Essay on Radiometric Dating by Jonathon Woolf by http://www.jwoolfden.com/rad_dat.html • Roberts - radiometric survey (Part 1 is in "overview" section) http://lordibelieve.org/time/age4.PDF • Dalrymple - principles http://talkorigins.org/faqs/dalrymple/scientific_age_earth.html • Dalrymple - responses http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dalrymple/radiometric_dating.html#h8 Lindsay - consistency between methods http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/crater_chain.html Neyman - Ch 2 of "T not B" (RATE) - intro & 10 links to Wikipedia http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter2.htm Neyman - Review of "Answers Book" Ch 4 [survey, re: C-14, radiometric, and more] http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/answersbook/abc4.htm
|
miscellaneous Woody - Lord Kelvin revisited on the young age of the earth (Technical) AIG-YE-claim http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v13/i1/kelvin.asp |
miscellaneous EH - cosmic rays & radiation [category?] http://www.geocities.com/earthhistory/tcn.htm Neyman - bad dates, halos, etc http://answersincreation.org/radiohalos.htm BIG links-page [lots to check!] http://www.tim-thompson.com/radiometric.html
|
short-lived isotopes are missing Is Young-Earth Creationism a Heresy? [OE for No-AiG] http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/is_yec_heresy_jm.htm Sarfati - Is the absence of short-lived radionuclides a problem for the Biblical timescale [this is very small part of page] (Semi-Technical) http://answersingenesis.org/home/area/feedback/negative_17December2001.asp
|
short-lived isotopes are missing short-lived isotopes are missing -- http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/isotope_list.html Short-lived isotopes Th-230 and U-236 exist on the moon. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CF/CF220.html
|
RATE • RATE * brief intro plus links to pages that are in other sections of this page, labeled (RATE) http://icr.org/rate/ and three reviews from AIG: • Oard - overview/review of RATE-book [2000], Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i2/radiodating.asp • Lisle - RATE research reveals remarkable results—a fatal blow to billions of years [2005, re: "Thousands not Billions" conference] http://answersingenesis.org/docs2005/1107rate.asp RATE Posters at AGU Conference http://icr.org/research/index/researchp_aguconference/ |
RATE • Isaac - PSCF June-07 (available soon) • Neyman - end of review [re: conclusions] of RATE-book, "Thousands not Billions" http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter11.htm • Meyers (from IBSS) - review of RATE-book, Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth, http://www.bibleandscience.com/science/radioisotopes.htm Kevin Henke - non-open bias in YE science http://answersincreation.org/rats_rate.htm and (similar theme) in http://answersincreation.org/rats.htm Meert [2003] - http://gondwanaresearch.com/rate.htm Ross (on radio) with Rana, Bontrager, + Wiens -- http://www.reasons.org/resources/multimedia/rtbradio/archives_creation_update/200307-12archives.shtml#20030918 Neyman - RATE -- http://answersincreation.org/rate_nonsense.htm Neyman - http://answersincreation.org/rate.htm Neyman [2006] - re: JMorris early in RATE [1997] http://answersincreation.org/rebuttal/icr/drjohn/drjohn_104.htm Neyman - review of RATE-book, ThousandsÉ not Billions [and chapter-reviews are in appropriate sections] http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_review.htm Epic Idiot - review of RATE-video, Radioisotopes & the Age of The Earth - http://www.epicidiot.com/evo_cre/vr_radioisotopes_age_earth.htm
|
|
|
|
Woodmorappe & Morton, Shimmerich, Henke Woody - Glenn R. MortonÕs Misuse of WoodmorappeÕs List Of Discrepant Isotopic Dates http://trueorigin.org/ca_jw_02.asp |
Woodmorappe & Morton, Shimmerich, Henke Morton-Woody-Morton: 1. first part of http://home.entouch.net/dmd/age.htm 2. http://www.trueorigin.org/ca_jw_02.asp 3. http://home.entouch.net/dmd/woodrad.htm Shimmerich-Woody-Shim 1. http://talkorigins.org/faqs/woodmorappe-geochronology.html 2. http://talkorigins.org/faqs/woodgeo/wood1.html 3. http://talkorigins.org/faqs/woodgeo/schimm1.html Henke - re: Lu-Hf in w-99 http://answersincreation.org/distortion.htm Henke - re: U-Pb in w-99 http://answersincreation.org/henke_woodmorappe_references.htm Henke - misquotations http://answersincreation.org/misquote_woodmorappe.htm Henke - discarding data? http://answersincreation.org/billgoods.htm more Woody is in K-Ar and Ar-Ar sections
|
inaccurate dates [these are mixed into other sections, to criticize specific methods] Williams - Flaws in dating the earth as ancient http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i1/earth.asp |
inaccurate dates Lindsay - http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/anomalous.html Radiometric dating gives unreliable results http://answersincreation.org/argument/G12_creation_science.htm
Radiometric dating gives unreliable results. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD010.html Consistency of radiometric dating comes from selective reporting http://answersincreation.org/argument/G115_creation_science.htm
Consistency of radiometric dating comes from selective reporting. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD020.html Neyman - Are Dating Techniques Accurate? http://answersincreation.org/dating.htm Neyman - [title says ÒradiohalosÓ butÉ] http://answersincreation.org/radiohalos.htm Neyman - RATE & Deception http://answersincreation.org/ratedeception.htm Neyman - Review of RATE-book, Ch 7 [re: wrong dating] http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter7.htm
Neyman - Review of T-not-B, Ch 8 [case studies] http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter8.htm
|
super-fast decay rates Wieland-2003 (re: RATE, acknowledges "there were many independent lines of evidence that suggested that huge amounts of radioactive decay had indeed taken place" but earth is young so "there must have been speeded-up decay" http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v26/i2/radiometric.asp and similar from 2003, http://answersingenesis.org/docs2003/0821rate.asp Walker, Radioactive Decay Rate Depends on Chemical Environment * http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v14/i1/decay_rate.asp Woodmorappe, Billion-fold Acceleration of Radioactivity Demonstrated in Laboratory * (Semi-Technical) http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i2/acceleration.asp Chaffin, A Mechanism for Accelerated Radioactive Decay * http://creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/37/37_1/chaffin/acceldecay.html Chaffin, Accelerated Decay: Theoretical Models * http://icr.org/pdf/research/RATE_ICC_Chaffin.pdf |
super-fast decay rates Henke - YEs admit extensive decay http://answersincreation.org/rate_admit.htm Radiometric dating falsely assumes that rates are constant http://answersincreation.org/argument/G114_creation_science.htm
Radiometric dating falsely assumes that rates are constant. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CF/CF210.html Physical constants are only assumed constant. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CE/CE410.html Cosmic rays and free neutrinos affect U and Ar decay rates http://answersincreation.org/argument/G113_creation_science.htm
Cosmic rays and free neutrinos affect U and Ar decay rates. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD004.html Neyman - Ch 9 (Theories of Accelerated Nuclear Decay) http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter9.htm evidence for constancy of constants (rad-decay...) http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/constant_evidence.html Meert - Were Adam & Eve Toast? http://gondwanaresearch.com/hp/adam.htm Neyman-quote - "Woodmorappe's Billion-fold Distortion of 187Re Radioactive Decay or How Young-Earth Creationists Misapply Conditions in the Cores of Hot Massive Stars to their 'Genesis Earth' "
|
radiometric dating & geology Snelling - Radioisotope dating of rocks in the Grand Canyon http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v27/i3/canyon.asp Walker - The way it really is: little known facts about radiometric dating [re: geology & pomo circular logic] -- http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v24/i4/radiometric.asp Lubenow - The pigs took it all [re: fossils & pomo-circular] http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i3/pigs.asp VOLCANIC ROCKS (below) Snelling, The Fallacies of Radioactive Dating of Rocks * [re: basalt flows in Grand Canyon] http://answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/radioactive-dating Snelling, Radioisotope Dating of Grand Canyon Rocks * [re: basalt-amphibolites] (RATE) http://icr.org/article/42/108/ Snelling, Isotope Systematics and Recent Andesite Flows * [re: Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd, Pb-Pb ratios] http://icr.org/pdf/research/ICCMt_Ngauruhoe-AAS.pdf Snelling, Dating of Somerset Dam * http://icr.org/pdf/research/ICCSOMERSETDAM_2-AAS.pdf
|
radiometric dating & geology Neyman - Radioisotope Dating of Rocks in the Grand Canyon http://answersincreation.org/rebuttal/magazines/Creation/2005/article_v27_i3_grand_canyon.htm Radiometric dating falsely assumes rocks are closed systems http://answersincreation.org/argument/G111_creation_science.htm
Radiometric dating falsely assumes rocks are closed systems. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD001.html Radiometric dating falsely assumes initial conditions are known http://answersincreation.org/argument/G112_creation_science.htm
Radiometric dating falsely assumes initial conditions are known. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD002.html strata & radiometry -- http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/confirm.html TO-faq - Radiometric Dating and the Geological Time Scale - http://talkorigins.org/faqs/dating.html KBS Tuff shows the flaws of radiometric dating http://answersincreation.org/argument/G141_creation_science.htm
KBS Tuff shows the flaws [inconsistent dates] of radiometric dating. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD031.html
|
| |
carbon-14 Baumgardner - Carbon Dating Undercuts Evolution's Long Ages (RATE) -- http://icr.org/article/117/ Baumgardner and others, Measurable 14C in Fossilized Organic Materials [RATE] * http://icr.org/pdf/research/RATE_ICC_Baumgardner.pdf Baumgardner (re: some C-14 in Òold thingsÓ in RATE) http://globalflood.org/earthage/index.html C-14 -- http://globalflood.org/papers/2003ICCc14.html Snelling - Stumping old-age dogma http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i4/dogma.asp Aardsma, Myths Regarding Radiocarbon Dating * http://icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=293 Giem, Carbon 14 Dating Models * http://grisda.org/origins/24050.htm Giem, Carbon-14 Content of Fossil Carbon * http://grisda.org/origins/51006.htm Brown, Carbon 14 Dating * http://www.creation-science-prophecy.com/C14.htm Pitman, Carbon-14 * http://naturalselection.0catch.com/Files/carbon14.html Hasel, Recent Developments in Near Eastern Chronology and Radiocarbon Dating * http://grisda.org/origins/56006.pdf TREE RINGS AND C-14 (below) Batten, Tree Ring Dating (dendrochronology) * AIG-YE-claim http://answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/docs/tree_ring.asp Brown - Can Tree Rings Be Used to Calibrate Radiocarbon Dates? * http://grisda.org/origins/22047.htm Major - Dating in Archaeology: Radiocarbon & Tree-Ring Dating * http://www.apologeticspress.org/rr/rr1993/r&r9310a.htm Brantley - Dating in Archaeology: Challenges to Biblical Credibility * http://www.apologeticspress.org/defdocs/rr1993/r&r9311a.htm bad C-14 dates Snelling, Dating Dilemma: Fossil Wood in ÔAncientÕ Sandstone * http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v21/i3/fossilwood.asp Snelling, Young Radiocarbon Date for Ancient Fossil Wood * [in limestone] AIG-YE-claim http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i2/geology.asp Snelling, Radioactive ÔDatingÕ in Conflict * [fossil wood in basalt] http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i1/dating.asp and original technical article http://answersingenesis.org/Home/area/magazines/TJ/docs/TJ_v14n2_Crinum.pdf Stutz - Dating in Conflict (fossil-wood in sandstone) http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v19/i2/dating.asp |
carbon-14 Lindsay - http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/carbon.html Mark Aardsma (linked-to by Neyman) in 4 parts:
basics http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_method.php
precise? http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_precision.php
assumptions http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_assumptions.php
bad dates? http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_results.php Ross [pessimistic about C-14] http://reasons.org/resources/apologetics/carbon14.shtml Morton - C14 & algae layers http://home.entouch.net/dmd/suigetsu.htm c14-website http://www.c14dating.com/int.html [plus links at bottom: Measurement, Applications,...] TO - Hunt, residual C-14 http://talkorigins.org/faqs/c14.html Neyman - Review of "Thousands not Billions" (RATE), Ch 3 http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter3.htm Neyman - http://answersincreation.org/rebuttal/icr/drjohn/drjohn_115.htm Neyman (re: Wieland-1979) http://answersincreation.org/rebuttal/magazines/Creation/1979/article_v2_i2_carbon_dating.htm Neyman (re: Hovind) http://answersincreation.org/rebuttal/cse/cse_carbon_dating.htm pscf - Duff, C-14 & Lead Deposition - http://asa3.org/ASA/PSCF/1999/PSCF3-99Duff.html bad C-14 dates C-14 method is wrong because it is not adjusted for the flood http://answersincreation.org/argument/G12111_creation_science.htm Carbon dating gives inaccurate results http://answersincreation.org/argument/G121_creation_science.htm
Carbon dating gives inaccurate results. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011.html Variable C-14/C-12 ratio invalidates C-14 dating http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1211_creation_science.htm
Variable C-14/C-12 ratio invalidates C-14 dating. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_1.html Vollosovitch and Dima mammoths yielded inconsistent C-14 dates http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1212_creation_science.htm
Vollosovitch and Dima mammoths yielded inconsistent C-14 dates. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_2.html Living snails were C-14 dated at 2,300 and 27,000 years old http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1213_creation_science.htm
Living snails were C-14 dated at 2,300 and 27,000 years old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_3.html A freshly killed seal was C-14 dated at 1,300 years old http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1214_creation_science.htm
A freshly killed seal was C-14 dated at 1,300 years old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_4.html Triassic wood from Australia was dated at 33,000 years old http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1215_creation_science.htm
Triassic wood from Australia was dated at 33,000 years old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_5.html Ancient coal and oil are C-14 dated as only 50,000 years old http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1216_creation_science.htm
Ancient coal and oil are C-14 dated as only 50,000 years old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD011_6.html
|
K-Ar (excess Argon) Doolan - How do you date a New Zealand volcano? http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v13/i1/volcano.asp Snelling, Radioactive ÔDatingÕ Failure * [old age for recent lava flow] – condensed http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i1/dating.asp and long version * AIG-linked (Technical) http://icr.org/research/index/researchp_as_r01/ Austin, Excess Argon at Mount St. Helens * http://icr.org/research/index/researchp_sa_r01/ Snelling, Excess Argon: The ÔAchilles HeelÕ of Dating Volcanic Rocks * AIG-linked http://icr.orgarticle/436 Snelling, Crystal Rocks and the Problem of Excess Argon (RATE) * AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/438/ Swenson & Austin - Excess Argon within Mineral Concentrates from the New Dacite Lava Dome at Mt St Helens volcano – short/popular version (by Swenson) http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i3/radiodating.asp and original (by Austin) http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v10/i3/argon.asp Brown, Radioisotope Age * http://grisda.org/georpts/gr20_01.htm
|
K-Ar (excess Argon) K-Ar dating gives inaccurate results for modern volcanic rocks http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1231_creation_science.htm
K-Ar dating gives inaccurate results for modern volcanic rocks. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD013.html Neyman - review of "Grand Canyon" Ch 6 [re: K-Ar dating of volcanic in GC] http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/monument/c6.htm Lindsay - dating young lava http://don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/hawaii.html K-Ar dates of 1986 dacite from Mount St. Helens are very old http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1232_creation_science.htm
K-Ar dates of 1986 dacite from Mount St. Helens are very old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD013_1.html Henke - Mount Saint Helens Dacite Dating [K-Ar & Ar-Ar] http://answersincreation.org/dacite.htm Henke - K-Ar dating of volcanos http://answersincreation.org/blind.htm Henke - re: K-Ar in w-99 http://answersincreation.org/hidingnumbers.htm Henke - re: K-Ar [by Austin & Snelling] in w-99 http://answersincreation.org/henke_woodmorappe_shell.htm
|
Ar-Ar |
Ar-Ar Henke - Ar/Ar & K-Ar in w-99 http://answersincreation.org/chop_title.htm Henke - Ar-Ar Errors & Monitoring http://answersincreation.org/ar39ar40.htm Henke - Woody's Shotgun Attack http://answersincreation.org/shotgun.htm
|
Lu-Hf |
Lu-Hf Henke - Woody's distortions http://answersincreation.org/distortion.htm
|
U-Th-Pb Snelling, The Failure of U-Th-Pb 'Dating' at Koongarra, Australia * http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v9/i1/dating.asp Snelling, Dubious Radiogenic Pb Behavior Places U-Th-Pb Mineral Dating in Doubt* * (Semi-Technical) AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/462 Snelling - The age of Australian uranium http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v4/i2/uranium.asp |
U-Th-Pb The U-Th-Pb method, properly corrected for neutron capture gives recent dates http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1261_creation_science.htm
The U-Th-Pb method, properly corrected for neutron capture, gives recent dates. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD016.html U-Th dating gives inaccurate results for modern volcanic rocks http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1221_creation_science.htm
U-Th dating gives inaccurate results for modern volcanic rocks. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD012.html Henke - what Woody ignores http://answersincreation.org/henke_woodmorappe_references.htm Henke - Pb isotopes & age of earth http://answersincreation.org/lead.htm
|
isochron method [this is one of 4 main aspects of RATE] Snelling - Radioactive dating method Ôunder fireÕ [re: isochron] http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i2/radioactive.asp Austin & Snelling, Discordant Potassium-Argon Model and Isochron Ages* [K-Ar and Rb-Sr] http://icr.org/research/index/researchp_sa_r03 Overn, Isochron Rock Dating is Fatally Flawed * http://tccsa.tc/articles/isochrons2.html Plaisted, Problems With Isochrons * http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/isochron.html Snelling, U-Th-Pb Dating: An Example of False Isochrons * http://icr.org/research/index/researchp_as_uthpbdating Snelling and others [differing isochrons shows that decays were accelerated] * http://icr.org/pdf/research/ICCBassRapidsSill_2-%20AAS_SA_and_WH.pdf Rb-Sr ISOCHRONS (below) Austin, Excessively Old ÔAgesÕ for Grand Canyon Lava Flows* AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/353
|
isochron method [we need a good introductory explanation of what method is, how & why it works] Isochron dating gives unreliable results http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1241_creation_science.htm
Isochron dating gives unreliable results. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD014.html Isochron date of young Grand Canyon lava is excessively old http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1242_creation_science.htm
Isochron date of young Grand Canyon lava is excessively old. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD014_1.html TO - Stassen - isochron dating http://talkorigins.org/faqs/isochron-dating.html pscf - Davis Young - re: isochrons & more (March 2007, not yet on web) Rb-Sr ISOCHRONS (below) TO - Stassen - ICR Grand Canyon Project - http://talkorigins.org/faqs/icr-science.html Neyman - Woodmorappe Can't Read Rb-Sr Diagrams [isochrons] http://answersincreation.org/woodmorappe_diagrams.htm
|
zircons — helium diffusion Humphreys - A Tale of Two Hourglasses AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/3131/78/ Humphreys, Nuclear Decay: Evidence for a Young World (RATE) * AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/302/ 1 - Humphreys - New RATE Data Support a Young World http://icr.org/article/114/
2 - Humphreys and others, Helium Diffusion Age of 6,000 Years Supports Accelerated Nuclear Decay * http://creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/41/41_1/Helium.htm
3 - Henke, Young-Earth Creationist Helium Diffusion Dates [re: #1 and 2] http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/original.html
4 - Humphreys, Helium EvidenceÉ Remains Crystal-Clear [re: #3 by Henke] * http://trueorigin.org/helium01.asp
5 - Henke - [re: #4 by Humphreys] http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/zircons.html
6 - Humphreys, Helium EvidenceÉ Overcomes Pressure [re: #5 by Henke] http://trueorigin.org/helium02.asp
7 - Henke [re: #6 by Humphreys] http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/appendixc.html and http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/appendixd.html Russ Humphreys vs Joe Meert (with intro by Sarfati) http://answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1030meert.asp RATE - Helium diffusion rates support accelerated nuclear decay (RATE) (Technical) by Humphreys, Austin, Baumgardner, Snelling AIG-linked available in HTML http://globalflood.org/papers/2003ICChelium.html and PDF http://icr.org/pdf/research/Helium_ICC_7-22-03.pdf
|
zircons — helium diffusion [this is part of RATE so it's discussed in that section] Zircons retain too much helium for an old earth http://answersincreation.org/argument/G1251_creation_science.htm
Zircons retain too much helium for an old earth. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD015.html Christman - critique of RATE's Zircon-Helium Diffusion Project http://answersincreation.org/RATE_critique_he-zr.htm Neyman - review of RATE-book, Thousands not Billions, Ch 4 http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter4.htm Neyman - re: the Henke-Humphreys series (see below) and YE persuasion-methods http://answersincreation.org/helium.htm TO-faq - Henke - this is #4 in a complex series of replies & counter-replies at the left, which I'll try to clarify; in the heading and first paragraph, he links to #1 (several papers you can find at his link to "Humphreys 2003"), #2 (his original article, but he recommends reading #4), #3 (Humphrey-2005, a reply to #2), #5 (Humphrey, January 2006, a reply to #3), and #6 (Appendices C and D by Henke, July 2006) http://talkorigins.org/faqs/helium/zircons.html
|
zircons — fission tracks |
zircons — fission tracks Neyman - review of RATE-book, Thousands not Billions, Ch 6 http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter6.htm
|
halos Walker - New radiohalo find challenges primordial granite claim http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i1/radiohalo.asp Taylor & Macintosh & Walker - [radiohaloes in coalified wood] AIG-YE-claim http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v23/i4/geologictime.asp Snelling, Polonium Radiohalos: Still ÔA Very Tiny MysteryÕ * (Semi-Technical) AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/471 Snelling - Radiohalos: Significant And Exciting Research Results , Ph.D. (RATE) (evidence of accelerated decay during Flood year, Semi-Technical) AIG-linked http://icr.org/article/301/108/ Snelling - Polonium Radiohalos: The Model for Their Formation Tested and Verified , Ph.D. (RATE) http://icr.org/article/2467/108/ Armitage - New record of polonium radiohalos, Stone Mountain granite, Georgia http://answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i1/radiohalos.asp Snelling & Armitage, Radiohalos: A Tale of Three Granitic Plutons * in HTML http://globalflood.org/papers/2003ICCradiohalo.html and PDF http://icr.org/pdf/research/ICCRADIOHALOS-AASandMA.pdf Helder - ItÕs about time [bio of Robert Gentry] http://answersingenesis.org/creation/v10/i2/time.asp
|
halos Polonium haloes indicate a young earth http://answersincreation.org/argument/G131_creation_science.htm
Polonium haloes indicate a young earth. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CF/CF201.html TO-faq - intro for next 2 pages http://talkorigins.org/faqs/po-halos
TO - Bailleul http://talkorigins.org/faqs/po-halos/gentry.html
TO - Brawley http://talkorigins.org/faqs/po-halos/violences.html Wakefield - geology of halo-rocks http://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/gentry/tiny.htm Neyman - review of RATE's "T not B" Ch 5 http://answersincreation.org/bookreview/tnb/thousands_not_billions_chapter5.htm Neyman - summary http://answersincreation.org/polonium.htm Deem - summary http://godandscience.org/youngearth/polonium.html
|
|
|
|
| | |