by Craig Rusbult, PhD (in Education, C&I)
I'm writing this page to help you decrease boredom by increasing variety.
the problem: Based on my experience when playing the role of “leader” in ballroom dancing,* I think most leaders (aka leads) feel uncomfortable when, after a minute of a 4-minute song, they have led all the patterns they know so they must begin repeating. A leader doesn't want to make the dance boring for their partner. They want to make dancing more fun, and the adventure of variety can help this happen! 🙂 {* A feeling of discomfort — because I want to be more effective in helping each dance be a fun adventure for my partner — was stronger in my early days as a leader, but even now it hasn't disappeared. }
a solution: To increase the variety-and-fun for their partner, a leader can multiply the number of patterns that are available if they use transfers-of-patterns, IF when they learn a pattern in one kind of dance, they transfer this pattern to other dances. For example, most patterns from one 6-step dance (waltz, foxtrot, rumba, mambo, cha cha,...) can work well in other 6-step dances. And we can transfer patterns from one 4-step dance (foxtrot, swing,...) to another. Using transfer-of-patterns is one strategy (among many) for increasing fun with dancing. { transfers in 6-Step & 4-Step Dances }
a problem (for both dancers): Along with my partner, I also was bored when I knew only a few patterns, so I had to repeat these patterns (over & over & over & over) during an evening. Now I know many more patterns — although not nearly what is possible, what I've seen other dancers do, or I can imagine — but boredom still is a problem for a leader, because... Followers get to dance whatever is led by a variety of leaders, so they can have many “magical mystery tour” experiences, often wondering “what will happen next?” throughout the evening, and getting different answers from each new partner. But as a leader, I get to dance only what I know (nothing more), over and over.
variety with quality: Therefore, to increase fun and decrease boredom, for my partner and myself, I enjoy learning new patterns that work smoothly. A pattern will "work smoothly" when it's compatible with the physics-and-physiology of myself and (especially) my partner, when the physics allows a smooth transition from the direction she was moving to the new direction she will be moving after the change I ask her to make, and when she can make this change because it doesn't demand more of her physiology than she is capable of doing, and will enjoy doing, with her body (structural frame, muscles of legs & feet,...) and mind (in responding appropriately to my leads). {note: I will refer to leaders & followers as he & she, because that's been my experience, and it's usually (but not always) the gender-roles, and it's traditional, is linguistically easier, etc.} And also psychology because a leader must communicate clearly – with good timing (not too early, not too late) – what is planned for “our next actions” so the follower can “do these actions” to produce effective cooperation for the partners.
These principles for skillful dancing (by using physics-and-physiology and psychology) are explained with more detail in more about leading & following.
Using Transfer-of-Learning to Increase Variety
Teaching for Transfer: In 1994, I wrote a series of pages that outline a system I developed for helping students quickly learn
a wide variety of ballroom dancing patterns, with each having rhythm, timings, and movements that “work” so the pattern feels good and looks good. The basic strategy is teaching for transfer so when students learn a pattern in one kind of dance, they can transfer this pattern to other dances.
Two Kinds of Dances: This system
is based on my observation, in 1992-1994 when I was learning how to dance,
that most ballroom dances are in two categories (six-step or four-step) and dances within each category can share many of the same step-sequences.
Transfers of Patterns: For
example, many patterns from any six-step dance (waltz, rumba, foxtrot, cha cha, mambo, salsa,
nightclub two-step,...) can be used in other six-step dances, so there can be major transfers of learning. Similarly, in
four-step dances (foxtrot, east coast swing, country two-step,...) patterns can be moved from one dance to another. And sometimes patterns can be used in both 6-step and 4-step dances, as in hybrid mixes (see end of page) and adaptations.
non-Transfers: But sometimes a pattern cannot be easily transfered between dances, due to differences in tempo (if during one dance it's too fast for comfort, or too slow) or in the styling of a dance.
Rhythms: For both groups, 6-step and 4-step, several rhythms are used. A 6-step pattern can be danced in 6 counts (1 1 1 1 1 1) as in a waltz, or 8 counts (2 1 1 2 1 1, or 1 1 2 1 1 2) in foxtrot, rumba, mambo, or nightclub two-step,* or the 8 counts (1 1 triple-step 1 1 triplestep) of cha cha. And a 4-step pattern can be modified from “slow,
slow, quick quick” in
6 counts (2 2 1 1) to “trip-le step, trip-le step, quick quick” (also basically 2 2 1 1) or “quick
quick quick quick” in
4 counts (1 1 1 1). {more about Rhythms & Tempos and Measuring & Changing Tempos}
Also, Transition Diagrams (at end of page) illustrate the principle of a leader knowing the options for “what can be done next,” and making skillful real-time decisions about changing to “the next pattern.” This knowledge/skill is essential for making decisions that allow a smooth flow-of-motion from one pattern to another, by cooperating with our physics-physiology-psychology.
* a problem: In a complicating factor, some 6-step dances with 4-count music are taught by different teachers using different rhythm-patterns. For example, rumba is commonly taught in two ways, with some teachers choosing “Slow Quick Quick” (S-QQ which is 211) but others “Quick Quick Slow” (QQS- which is 112). Some dances always use one or the other, as with S-QQ/211 (foxtrot) or QQS-/112 (mambo, cha cha) while other dances (rumba, nightclub 2-step) are taught both ways by different teachers. This can make a transfer more difficult, because (for example) if a particular pattern begins on the initial Slow (S) the leader must begin this sequence on the 1-step (of the 6-step pattern) and the musical 1-count with S-QQ; but with QQS- it's on the 3-step (of the pattern) and 3-count (of the music). This requires changing habits, and it makes transfer more difficult.
two solutions: So should a leader change all of their rhythm-thinking to either S-QQ or QQS- , to make things less difficult? Maybe. But probably you should try to become comfortable-and-skillful with both, although dancing more with the rhythm you prefer, so you can become more skillful due to the extra practice. / If you want to transfer patterns from a QQS- dance (mambo, cha cha, nightclub two-step), you can count your rumba as QQS-, and this “matching of rhythms” will make the timing of step-transfers easier & better. But for a transfer of patterns from a foxtrot (or waltz, IMO) that's S-QQ, you can “match rhythms” by dancing your rumba as S-QQ. Personally, I like S-QQ for Rumba (because it feels more like a smooth waltz), but I also can “think Nightclub Two-Step” and feel comfortable with QQS-.
Variety in Leading: When dance-leaders know how to transfer patterns from one dance to another, this greatly increases the variety of the patterns they are able to lead. Learning the principles of pattern-transfer also will help followers, but it's especially useful for leaders. Knowing a variety of patterns lets a leader use the principle of mixing confirmations with surprises that is useful in dancing & music, humor & drama, in conversations and other areas of life. But although variety is a nice “bonus” it's more important to dance each pattern with high quality — so it feels good (for both of you) and looks good (for whoever is watching)* — by cooperating with your partner to make it work well.
Variety in Styling: Of course, the same pattern can (and should) have different styling when the dance-context changes, due to differences in music, tempo, rhythm, mood/attitude, skill of partner, and relationship with partner. In some ways this is analogous to variations in musical styles — as illustrated in a book I bought that included a phonograph record with the same tune played in many styles (swing jazz, be bop, blues, march, classical, dixieland, rock,...)* — and similar variations occur when the same dance pattern is used with different stylings in different dance-contexts.
* Two responsibilities of a leader are: don't injure your partner, and help them look good. Of course, how you do these will depend on your partner. Some of my partners seemed able to cope with anything I could do (within reason), no matter how complex or fast, but others have been less nimble and skillful. So I adjust. At two extremes... elderly ladies at a community center, who were less nimble-strong-skillful, more vulnerable to injury, so our patterns were easier & slower, by contrast with... a medium-young lady at a church dance, held in the Monona Center with a hardwood dance floor plus a larger area with low-pile carpet that was smooth but with high friction, that wasn't ideal for a follower who must make fast movements that are unplanned. After the dance I noticed she was wearing high heels; I said “if I was wearing those heels, within a few seconds I would have been on the ground with sprained ankles” and she said “with enough practice we can become very skillful at doing difficult things in heels.”
* Although using “variations on a theme” is useful for teaching, in dancing or music, the usual reason for musicians to adjust style is when they want to express themselves artistically. Musicians like to play their own version(s) of a song. For example, I've heard many versions of Summertime played in a wide variety of styles by many bands (i.e. teams of musicians) and each team performed it with excellent quality to make wonderful music, in very different ways.
Adding Variety with Hybrids
Pure (6-with-6 or 4-with-4) Hybrids: Because "many patterns from any six-step dance (waltz, rumba, boxtrot, mambo,
cha cha,...) can be used in other six-step dances," during one type of dance (waltz,...) you can use a pattern that is unusual for this dance but is common in another six-step dance — IF it can be suitably adapted so it feels good and looks good — for variety and a change of pace that mixes confirmations with surprises. In a similar way, dancers in Country Two-Step often mix patterns from two 4-step dances, foxtrot and swing, and the resulting hybrid is what you typically see on a dance floor; they also can use patterns from 6-step dances, if these are adapted to make them fit smoothly into the 4-step dance rhythms.
A Hybrid Rhythm: During a 6-step foxtrot pattern in 8 counts ( with patterns of 1_34,5_78) a leader can temporarily shift into the analogous 6-step waltz pattern in 6 counts (with 123,456) for a temporary period lasting 12 counts [or 24, 36, 48, ...] and then shift back into 4-step foxtrot patterns. When this is done well (and it isn't difficult) the waltz pattern “works” and is a nice change of pace that adds variety. Yes, throwing 3-count patterns into 4-count music is a bit unusual, but when it's done occasionally it can be a refreshing change of pace, to give your dancing an “extra smooth” feeling for awhile. This is one way, among many possibilities, to add some variety to the dancing experience of your partner, contributing to the spice of life by "mixing confirmations with surprises."
An Important Basic Skill
For both roles, but especially followers, it's extremely useful to practice each rhythm-pattern while moving in every possible direction (forward, backward, sideways, turning left or right) with small steps or larger steps, while keeping the rhythm-pattern of your dancing, and keeping this in time with the music. You can practice this essential skill on your own, without a partner, just with the music and your own music-coordinated motions.
And an important skill for leaders is...
deciding “the next pattern” for Improvised Dancing Transition Diagrams show possibilities
for “what to do next” in... |
Learning from Other Teachers:
As explained later, I've done a lot of thinking about learning-and-teaching, but not much actual teaching. Therefore I'm hoping to discuss these ideas with teachers who have more experience. Although I have abundant experience with teaching in many areas (with wide variety, ranging from juggling to physics)* and with learning in many areas (mental & physical, including ballroom dancing) and with observing teachers (of ballroom, and in other areas), it would be very useful to get feedback from skilled, experienced teachers of ballroom dancing. This would be greatly appreciated by me, and probably our discussions also would be useful for them.
If you & I discuss ideas – with a sharing of your ideas & my ideas – you can think-and-say “yes!” or “yes and...” (yes! plus adding your own ideas) or “yes but...” (with questions) or “maybe” or “no because...” (with reasons to disagree). And so can I. Each of these responses can be useful when we're learning from each other.
* My learning-and-teaching experiences with juggling have been especially relevant because some of its teaching strategies would (with some adapting) be useful for helping students learn new dancing patterns. But useful insights also have come from teaching other mental-and-physical skills (music theory & improvisation and tennis) plus strategies (for learning, and for solving problems), and even from science (physics & chemistry & problem-solving design thinking) & math, and more.
Principles for Dancing Here are some quotations from the “details” page I wrote in March 1994, with some comments added [inside brackets] in 2012: Try to develop skill [with frame & leading] early — for the benefit of yourself (so you can learn the principles and patterns) and for your partners (so they will have something worthwhile to “respond to” and can learn to follow skillfully). ... Let your partner know what you want to happen next, soon enough that she can do it — i.e., soon enough that she is not already physically committed (due to her momentum and direction-of-stepping) to doing what she would need to do if there was a continuation of the previous pattern. ... Make easily recognizable differences between the leads for one pattern and another. [This timing-and-clarity of leading will help minimize the “backleading” that occurs when a follower anticipates a lead and begins to do a movement that wasn't led.]* The “strength” of a lead — whether it physically moves a partner in a certain direction, or merely “suggests” what to do so she can respond (either consciously or in muscle memory) and do it independently — will depend on the pattern, and on the skill and style of yourself and your partner. ... { terms: My use of he & she, for a leader & follower, is explained earlier. } Techniques of Teaching MORE — In the future, I'll describe other ideas about techniques to improve efficiency and to achieve other educational goals. One idea, outlined here very briefly, is that most rotation-patterns (and many other patters) are identical for leads & follows, they're just offset in time: what a leader does at one time, a follower does at another time. Therefore, instead of wasting valuable in-class time by explaining each pattern separately, a teacher can have the entire class learning-and-practicing the same set of patterns. Then dancers get together in couples, to practice doing these patterns as a two-person unit with leading-and-following, with the proper "offsets in time." Later, I'll explain this dancing principle (and associated teaching strategy) more thoroughly, with examples & details, along with other techniques for teaching. Movements with Rhythm Dancing with Music Principles for Transfer of Learning I.O.U. — More could be said in each of these paragraphs, and others, but that's all for now. Also, above you'll find Rhythms and Variety in Leading (with some surprises) and Variety in Styling and below, Matching Styles and Hybrids. |
a personal history of AFAIK, an emphasis on “teaching for transfer” (it's my emphasis in this page) isn't common among teaches of ballroom. One exception I know (and certainly there are others) is Victor Eijkhout – compared with me, he is “more expert” as a teacher of dancing-and-music – who independently discovered the principle of pattern-transfers, saying "There are a few implications to all these resemblances [between the QQS/SQQ rhythms of different dances]: You can steal moves from all these dances for your two-step material. ..... You can dance two-step to other kinds of dance music that have the right tempo. ..... You can dance other dances to two-step music." Most of my writing about dance-teaching was at two times in 1994, and below are the main results, with each link below opening the new page in its own new window, so this page remains open in this window: |
written in March 1994, for Wisconsin Union Mini-Courses |
written in August 1994, for UWMBDA, UW-Madison Ballroom Dance Association |
proposal (this is fairly detailed) • 2012 Proposal { see its IOU } |
proposal (this is an informal rough outline) |
details (principles for dancing and teaching) • | |
rhythms (variations
for 6-step and 4-step dances) change music tempo with Audacity (written 2008) |
|
system (a beginning, with much less detail than in August; but a few of these ideas are missing in August) | matrix (a visual
summary of the system described below) system (showing some possibilities that can be developed) [a thought in 2012: I wish I knew now, what I knew in 1994.] diagrams (not organized or labeled, in pencil not ink) |